There seems to be a shortage of ethics
I wrote a short essay on ethics. Auditors, tenants and Boards do not always act in a legal or ethical manner. I guess that is too high of a standard for many of us.
Auditors
From a recent article in the Boston Globe.
Ernst & Young fined $100 million over cheating on ethics tests
Hundreds of auditors at accounting giant Ernst & Young cheated on ethics tests they were required to take to get or maintain their professional licenses, and the company withheld evidence of the misconduct from federal authorities investigating the matter, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Tenants
Here we go again. Another tenant refuses to pay the rent. The landlord’s company may be Smart Stays but perhaps he should have been a Smart Landlord.
Ontario landlord claims he’s owed $76,000 in rent by a Canadian border guard
CTV News (abridged)
Jon Woodward
03 November 2022
An Ontario landlord is throwing up his hands in frustration after trying to evict a tenant he claims owes him $12,000 in rent for a lakefront property — only to have that figure skyrocket to more than $76,000 by the time proceedings to evict him were over.
A CTV News Investigation has shown this is not the first time the tenant, Riccardo Gagliardi, has defended himself at the Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) for non-payment of thousands of dollars in rent — all while being an officer at the Canadian Border Services Agency.
Gagliardi met with CTV News to discuss the allegations, saying he has settled with one landlord, but believes his rights were not upheld in the Landlord and Tenant Board proceeding, and has appealed its finding against him to Ontario’s Divisional Court.
As time went by I knew this was unfair and I fought it and kept fighting it and I’m still going to keep fighting it,” Gagliardi said in an interview.
Adams wasn’t the only person in a rental dispute with Gaglardi. Bernhard Mattern also accused him in the LTB of not paying $18,000 in a rent-to-own agreement, and evicted him before the pandemic began.
“We got one payment and that’s it,” Mattern told CTV News in an interview. That dispute was settled for $10,000, both parties said.
Both Mattern and Adams turned to the authorities to remove Gaglardi, and both were surprised to discover that he was in law enforcement too, as an officer with the CBSA.
The CBSA confirmed to us that Gagliardi is an officer, though he is on medical leave. Gagliardi denied that he was facing any discipline, and the CBSA wouldn’t comment on that, citing privacy.
Lengthy delays add up
Adams said he rented his lakefront home on Beachview Drive in St. Catharines for $4,000 a month in August 2020. When he tried to terminate it three months later, the disputed rent was more than $12,000.
By the LTB’s first order the following August, it had grown to more than $36,000. And by a hearing the following February, it was more than $72,000. In the final ruling of the board in April 2022, the LTB denied Gagliardi’s final request for review.
“It is undisputed that the Tenant owes substantial arrears, The Landlord alleges the arrears exceed $76,000, or more than twice the jurisdiction of the Board,” member Nancy Morris wrote in her decision.
But getting to that decision was a roundabout process. The tenants appealed the first decision against them in August 2021, setting up an entirely new hearing. Then in November 25, 2021, there was “inadequate time to complete the hearing and it was adjourned,” one ruling says.
The landlord didn’t make a new hearing on December 15, 2021, and it was punted to January 25, 2022. On that day Gagliardi said he was sick and failed to wake up, the documents say. The LTB issued a new order in February, and the tenant requested a review of that on the grounds that he had a stroke and wasn’t able to participate, the documents said.
The board member refused, saying, “It is undisputed that the tenant has not disclosed any documentary evidence of what illness he suffered on January 25, 2022.”
Gagliardi appealed to Divisional Court, which put a stay on the LTB’s order — but by May that stay had been removed and the order to evict was allowed to be carried out.
That eviction was recorded on video by Adams. The whole process took about 21 months.
Gagliardi”s response
Gagliardi said he was trying to uphold his rights in the proceedings and was entitled to stand up for himself when he felt he wasn’t being treated fairly.
As for the property on Beachview Avenue, Gagliardi said he agreed to a lower rent thanks to COVID-19, and stayed there with a sick relative.
“I negotiated a good agreement,” Gagliardi said.
He claimed Adams raised the rent, and due to an illness, Gagliardi says he and his family couldn’t leave. He said that by appealing to Divisional Court, he is raising the stakes: the maximum that he can be ordered to pay at the LTB is $35,000, but there is no such maximum at Divisional Court.
operated the property through Smart Stays
Adams is worried he may never see the money. Adams, who operated the property through his company Smart Stays, recognized the role that the COVID-19 pandemic played in the lengthy proceeding.
“The maximum compensation would be $35,000. That’s a hard and fast rule that never changed under the extraordinary circumstances of COVID-19, which caused the LTB part of the delays.”
He said he wishes there was a way to easily look up tenants and their histories at the LTB so landlords could know what they were getting into.
Significant challenges says LTB
Tribunals Ontario, which operates the LTB, told CTV News they are working to modernize their organization and adapt after the pandemic.
“Over the past two years, the LTB has experienced significant challenges that have impacted its caseload, including the five-month moratorium on eviction hearings from March to August 2020, resulting in the loss of 25,000 hearing time slots,” a spokesperson said.
New applications are currently being scheduled, on average, within six to eight months, the spokesperson said.
Board presidents
I know of a condo where, at every AGM, the President brags about how well the building is maintained. Not so.
When the superintendent removed a ceiling tile from the B1 level ceiling, guess what I saw? A badly rusted out electrical box due to ongoing water leaks.
I also saw water running out a live electrical box everytime the water irrigation systen was turned on. Whenever it rained, I saw water running down one of the underground parking garage walls.
North York—Completely rusted out live electrical box due to water leaks
The problem with older condo corporations is that many of them do not have enough money to do all the repairs that are needed. So necessary repairs get pushed out far into the future.
Another problem is that people do not recognise issues when they see them.
Our manager and management company for our residental condo corporation, put their foot down and demanded a full Board meeting, since the paving company would be arriving and the Board needed to provide management with a copy of that contract. Management also has to advise owners on where to park when their outside spots are ripped up.
Management also wants all the fan coil records, quotes, etc., since the manager was not invited, or included, in any of those meetings.
There’s more. Since the last board meeting was in April, there are months of financial reports for the directors to receive and approve. There are also outstanding decisions that have to be voted on.
There was no vote on the fan coil valves—someone told them that this was not legal/valid. This is the second time the Board has done this. They want to remove the requirement that carpet must be on the residental unit floors and not enforce any resulting noise violations.
Clearly boards do not understand the basics of governance and don’t want to. What will be interesting is to see if they dump the manager again, or will start to act like a real board when and if we elect someone fresh to the table.
First Service quit, Maple Ridge was dumped when the Board didn’t want to make board decisions (let the president decide model), and one of the former kids at the management desk is gone but he is still with the same management company.
At least the fall colours view from my window is worth it. Makes it easier to think like a tenant and watch the circus.
— A reader in Peel Region
A couple of days ago, I was emailed a Status Certificate for a fairly new condo residental tower. I am familar with the building and I attended a couple of their AGMs.
The building looks great and the location is perfect.
After a quick look at the Status Certificate and the supplied audited Financial Statement, I was surprised at how bad things look. Oh my, how could anyone buy a unit there? It will take a while for me to read through records and report on my findings. Trust me, it will be a very interesting read.